Headlines



Date Published after
before
mm/dd/yyyy

Select a category to display:

Archives
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010

December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008

December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006

December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005

December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004

December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002

December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001

December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000

Study: Old growth forests bank carbon dioxide (OR)

Associated Press via Coos Bay World
September 18, 2008
By Jeff Barnard

Email this page

A group of forest scientists from the United States and Europe reports that a growing body of evidence settles an old question over whether old growth forests store more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than they release.

Based on a review of research from more than 500 forest sites around the world, the answer, published today in an online edition of the journal Nature, is that most forests between 15 and 800 years old do, and the total amounts to about 1 billion metric tons a year, or about 10 percent of the net carbon uptake worldwide.

Co-author Beverly Law, a professor of global change forest science at Oregon State University, said the findings argue for including credit for preserving old growth forests in the Kyoto Protocol and cap-and-trade schemes for controlling greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming.

“If you have an old forest on the ground, it’s probably better to leave it there than to cut it,” she said. “For the countries that did sign on to Kyoto, it is suggesting that perhaps they need to consider unmanaged primary forests in their carbon accounting.”

The United States did not sign the Kyoto agreement.

“The absolute amount of carbon stored in these forests is significant,” Law said from her office in Corvallis. “Once you disturb them by logging or fire, there is carbon loss. When that occurs, there is material left on site that decomposes. And some is lost in the manufacturing process.”

At U.N. talks last month in Accra, Ghana, aimed at a new global warming treaty, delegates agreed that countries should be compensated for slowing or halting deforestation, and that countries where forests have largely been depleted should be rewarded for conserving and expanding their forest cover.

About 30 percent of the world’s forests have not been significantly logged, and about half of that is in the boreal and temporal forests of the Northern Hemisphere, Law said. The review estimated that 1.3 billion metric tons, plus or minus 500 million metric tons, of carbon are absorbed by these forests annually.

The conventional wisdom for the last 40 years, based on one study of a young plantation forest, has been that old growth forests were carbon neutral, giving up as much from decomposition and gases released from the trees as they drew out of the atmosphere during photosynthesis, Law said.

Law is science chair of the AmeriFlux network of some 100 forest research sites around the country that measure carbon absorption, including one outside Sisters.

Those sites and a similar network known as CarboEurope have been finding since the 1990s that once most forests get more than 15 years old they absorb more carbon dioxide than they release, and continue doing so for centuries, she said. It just took several years to compile the research.

Ram Oren, a professor of forest ecology at Duke University also involved in the AmeriFlux network, said the evidence has been mounting for years showing forests are net carbon sinks, but this is the first time he has seen a total calculated.

“This represents the acknowledgment of something that the scientific community has already been sharing for awhile, that the old paradigm is incorrect,” Oren said from his office in Durham, N.C. “Now lets see the impact of it,” on greenhouse gas policy.

NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for research and educational purposes.

  faceboook

      
Issue directories

Global Food ChallengeGlobal Food Challenge
IATP explains the policies that have caused the food crisis and the solutions we need.

Green ChemistryGreen Chemistry
The Green Chemistry revolution is making safer products and protecting human health and the environment.

Local FoodsLocal Foods
IATP analyzes the key policy and marketplace issues driving local food systems.

NAFTANAFTA
NAFTA leaves a huge footprint on the U.S. and the world. As Washington gears up for the debate, IATP analyzes what's at stake.

WaterWater
From ethanol to privatization, water is a hot issue in trade and agriculture worldwide. Trade Observatory has document and headline collections dedicated to water issues.